Recent Forum Posts
From categories:
page 1123...next »

Hi,

  • If this is SCP-294, for weaponts i want explodium.
  • Can we get "A Manual on how to operate this thing"?
  • If we can get all weapons, than i want "Knowledge"?
  • Dose the thing give out "Mythril"?
  • Can it give me "The one Ring to rule them all"?
  • Can we teach it new words by putting stuff in, closing and than typing in the word?

Fighting Monsters and Language since 2016.
(Yes, i know its Fiction.)

The Armageddon Arsenal by Meta WonderratMeta Wonderrat, 29 Aug 2016 18:15

No, you haven't used your sandbox wrong at all. A sandbox is for every purpose, and you are actually correct that it is used to store drafts so you can ask for others to critique them. That is a huge part of a sandbox's usability.

And yes, it seems the image has finally disappeared. I shall mourn its loss for generations to come (and find a new one).


Spam Kill Team Member

(PM) | Admin: (Wikidot Community) | (Wikidot Index)

Re: Hard to find by DrCaduceusDrCaduceus, 28 Jul 2016 08:59

What is a mir? Found them.
I was revering to the missing picture in the berry mints tab.

Than i have used the sandbox wrong.
I use that to show the stuff of so i can get the quality checked, because there is allways something broken.

I did not want a rule just a way to see what changed on the recently changed tab.

Thanks, i can find it now.


Fighting Monsters and Language since 2016.
(Yes, i know its Fiction.)

Re: Hard to find by Meta WonderratMeta Wonderrat, 27 Jul 2016 22:19

There's an option called 'Compare versions' when you're looking at the page's history that marks new content in blue.

I really think there should be no law for all users to make comments on their sandboxes everytime they change content; the sandbox is intended for private use so that articles can be planned and written vefore being posted to the Wiki.

The changes are visible (I added another two paragraphs), though.

When I find a fellow author having a character, I usually add it so I can see about including them in some works. It's not so much a hall of fame, but I need to see if the character's been in a story before adding them. (It's Mir, by the way, not Mint.)


Spam Kill Team Member

(PM) | Admin: (Wikidot Community) | (Wikidot Index)

Re: Hard to find by DrCaduceusDrCaduceus, 27 Jul 2016 21:58

Looks like the Mint guys finally got to you(I liked that tab),

but thats not why i post here.

I cant find the changes you made.
I get shown that changes were made, but i cant find them.

This is a message to all who might read this.

Please fill out the short description box under your edits.
This really helps a lot when looking for the part of the side that changed.

Sorry, Cad, that this goes under your stuff, but i really dont know were else to put this.
If you dont want such comments in here i will remove it and find another place for it.

By the way, is there a special criteria to get into that hall of fame known as the "List of Known CI Staff"?


Fighting Monsters and Language since 2016.
(Yes, i know its Fiction.)

Hard to find by Meta WonderratMeta Wonderrat, 27 Jul 2016 14:10

Noted. Thank you for the clarification.


This thread? Started by aliens.

Re: Splinter by CytotoxicityCytotoxicity, 21 Jun 2016 10:34

Given the links you provided, no, our GOI page is not 'fucked up'. At least, not in the way you think.

The Chaos Insurgency Hub was created by members of the SCP Wiki for the GOI Format Contest in 2014. If you notice, the CI's GOI page was made months before the contest.

We also have no obligation to follow the SCP Wiki's CI hub's canon. We are a derivative spin-off of the Chaos Insurgency concept; we can1 be unrelated to how the Chaos Insurgency is portrayed on the other wiki.


Spam Kill Team Member

(PM) | Admin: (Wikidot Community) | (Wikidot Index)

Re: Splinter by DrCaduceusDrCaduceus, 20 Jun 2016 09:47

Our GOI page has been fucked up this whole time and nobody noticed? Wow.
And no, the link was not overlooked.


This thread? Started by aliens.

Re: Splinter by CytotoxicityCytotoxicity, 19 Jun 2016 22:06

Our GOI site has it also wrong.
The insurgency split from the foundation in 24, but was still under O5 controle.
We ditcht them in 48, declaring that The Insurgency was death.
Long live the Chaos Insurgency. O5 got a real shock there.
http://www.scp-wiki.net/chaos-insurgency-hub
Just in case the link in the point in my previus post was overlooked.


Fighting Monsters and Language since 2016.
(Yes, i know its Fiction.)

Re: Splinter by Meta WonderratMeta Wonderrat, 19 Jun 2016 22:01

Oh, I thought that the Insurgency split from the Foundation in 1924, not 1948. That is what it says in the GOI Page (unless I'm misinterpreting something here, which isn't anything new).

E: Okay, if I'm reading this right, the Splinter Incident of 1924 was a hoax set up by 05 Command to carry out missions that are politically questionable. The real split didn't occur until 1948. Christ, I'm stupid. Guess I'll have to fix that. Thank you for pointing that out.


This thread? Started by aliens.

Re: Splinter by CytotoxicityCytotoxicity, 19 Jun 2016 21:53

Are you sticking with 1924?
The Insurgency split off of the Foundation in 1948, at least according to this .
I would hate to lose that aspect of the CI.
I would normaly not care (headcanons be headcanons), but since you plan to make this an official guide im a bit concerned.
You say that this

may not necessarily represent the opinion of all site members

is this the paragraph for this case?


Fighting Monsters and Language since 2016.
(Yes, i know its Fiction.)

Splinter by Meta WonderratMeta Wonderrat, 19 Jun 2016 21:43

This thing should not be used at base 6 under any curcumstances.
Base 6, after ruin is basicly already 3 layers of reality.
Im not sure how this things would deal with so many layers.

(1th layer, the insurgency as invisiond by the collective CI writting commiunity,
2th layer, the insurgency that thinks it is in the first layer, but is actually a drug projection saving a past image and
3th layer, everyone is death, exept for some anomalies, Meta, Cad and Kuhli)

Dont look into base 6.
Quantum mechanicks have told us about superposition (something is every possible thing untill it is messured).
This glasses could collaps reality around base 6 superposition
or just drive everyone mad that looks at it.

I find the concept great, but i dont see the CI in this.
If you want to see other worlds without restrictions of reality or science try "Status Quo"
(the drug floting arround in the ruin base 6)
under the Codename "DREAM ARCADE".

The pictures fit, but with the weaky "lets go for it" and "the real Philadelphia Experiment" it sounds more like Site Zeta and less like an offical government operation.
It would be cool if Zeta really were behind it and doing a bad job hideing as a government project, that could be disproven very easiely.
I had a similar idear in the Zeta case were they used a bad coverstory to get someone from the GOI to investigate to extract information from the GOI member.

Why should the government use children?
If this is not like in "Evangelion" were only emo challenged teens could use the gigant robots then there is no point for it.
In the cold war the US would not prepare children for future use, but would seek a very short term solution. (I know its so that they could be still around today, but it dose not make any sens to me.) Ex armee members or highly trained officers, but not some children.

Might be possible that in there search for canidates they got a bad draw, mainly an insurgency member how stole the prototyps and plans and the lit the whole place on fire.


Fighting Monsters and Language since 2016.
(Yes, i know its Fiction.)

by Meta WonderratMeta Wonderrat, 10 Jun 2016 22:17

Some I've seen in the SCP Wiki, others I have used personally. Words like 'audio pareidolia' I found on paranormal research websites, so it seemed fitting.


This thread? Started by aliens.

by CytotoxicityCytotoxicity, 08 Jun 2016 02:51

I have not seen most of these terms ever used in a CI Wiki article at all. Some of them, like 'audio pareidolia', just seem like another flavor of usual terms, like anomaly.


Spam Kill Team Member

(PM) | Admin: (Wikidot Community) | (Wikidot Index)

by DrCaduceusDrCaduceus, 08 Jun 2016 02:46
Re: Finally
Nugget909Nugget909 23 May 2016 02:01
in discussion General / Per page discussions » Nuggetjr

Not sure if that is good or bad, but I will definitely contact you if I do any more splinter cell style articles


Nugget

Re: Finally by Nugget909Nugget909, 23 May 2016 02:01

Thank you for the feedback, for my next operation file I will use the template from the main wiki.


Nugget

Re: Staff Post: Open by Nugget909Nugget909, 23 May 2016 01:31

That was my english.

I am not talking about the Wikis or there authors.

Im talking about our in-universe organisations.

Im a member of the CI and SCP Wiki, but the conflict between the organisations is no conflict between Wikis or authors.
As i understood our relationship with the Foundation from here, calling them main opponents semeed fiting, but since you disagree, i will no longer use that phrasing.

I stand by my headcanon that the Insurgency hub is outdated information the SCPF is still using do to misinformation spread by the CI.


Fighting Monsters and Language since 2016.
(Yes, i know its Fiction.)

Re: Staff Post: Open by Meta WonderratMeta Wonderrat, 12 May 2016 19:48

Hello, Nuggetjr!

It should be noted that the format you're using is an original design by authors from the SCP Wiki, and secondary usage of that format should be attributed with a link to their hub (http://www.scp-wiki.net/chaos-insurgency-hub). You are also using images from their item format and their version of the CI Logo. That should be attributed to them as well.

To clear up any misunderstanding, especially for Meta, the Chaos Insurgency wiki is not related with the Chaos Insurgency hub found in the SCP Wiki. We do not obligate them to conform to our standards (that includes the Personnel Designations), so it's sort of hostile for you to call them 'our main opponent', since we have no qualms against their work or their design for the GoI.

I am giving a notice to Meta Wonderrat to quit antagonizing the SCP Wiki and to avoid phrasing that makes it seem like you think the CI and SCP are real organizations. You may reply to this post in case I have misunderstood your English.


Spam Kill Team Member

(PM) | Admin: (Wikidot Community) | (Wikidot Index)

Staff Post: Open by DrCaduceusDrCaduceus, 12 May 2016 16:33
Finally
Meta WonderratMeta Wonderrat 12 May 2016 10:09
in discussion General / Per page discussions » Nuggetjr

Hi,

good thing someone now takes on the foundation a bit harder.

Where was this cell?

I think the cell was isolated from main events and multible revolutions within the CI.

Some things have changed and the information used in the article is old school and i like that.
Seams like a good old splinter cell to me.

If you need any help with that, in and out of character tell me.

The stuff on the SCP Foundation site is intentionally not updated to our new standarts.
Its nice knowing that our main opponent has no clue how the CI structure works.


Fighting Monsters and Language since 2016.
(Yes, i know its Fiction.)

Finally by Meta WonderratMeta Wonderrat, 12 May 2016 10:09

Sometimes you just do something.

I think short fictions are a way to do things, but not my way of doing things.
If i already learned one thing about my writing than that i dont do easy.
Everything connects to everything.
I just cant stop that.
For ruin i made up stuff about existing stuff not of my making, voice of entropy and pincer servant.
If short works for you, thats great, but with me everything is an interlocking puzzel, and im just here to write the pieces that are missing.
If you need a new something to add to the wiki, you might want to try that.
You could be surprised how well the pieces fit together.


Fighting Monsters and Language since 2016.
(Yes, i know its Fiction.)

Re: Swarm Host by Meta WonderratMeta Wonderrat, 07 May 2016 00:52
page 1123...next »
Unless otherwise stated, the content of this page is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License