¿Podría darme un breve resumen?
Lo que podría reunir la propiedad cosa es una precisión inusual.
could you give me a brief summary?
What i could gather the thing property is an unusual accuracy.
Fighting Monsters and Language since 2016.
[[>]]
[[module Rate]]
[[/>]]
||**Item:**|| -your item name here- ||
||**Size:**|| optional -the size of the item here; use metric-||
||**Type:**|| optional -is it a fungus? a mammal? something made during the Renaissance?- ||
||**Living:**|| optional -Y/N- ||
||**Sentient:** || optional -Y/N- ||
||**Potential/Current Hazards**|| -Is it dangerous? //How// is it dangerous?- ||
||**Required Wear/Weaponry**|| -What should people wear/have when around the object? Is it only in the containment cell, or facility-wide?- ||
||**Location:**|| optional -where is the item being kept? ||
||**Reported Anomaly:**|| optional -what IS the anomaly? Consult the Terms page ||
++ **Usage**
How do you use the item? How do you activate it, if applicable? What safety measure do you have to do? What are the potential uses of the item?
The Usage portion should describe how we use the item, how careful we should be, how to take care of it, etc.
++ **Report**
What is the item? What does it look like? What's the size? What does it do? Is there something we should be aware of? What are its anomalous properties? How'd we find it? When? How do we store the item safely? How do we protect it?
The Report portion should describe the item, provide the protocols for storing it, etc.
[[div class="image-block block-right" style="width:300px;"]]
[[image image-name-here.jpg style="width:300px;" link=image-name-here.jpg]]
[[div class="image-caption" style="width:300px;"]]
Caption your image
[[/div]]
[[/div]]
¿Podría darme un breve resumen?
Lo que podría reunir la propiedad cosa es una precisión inusual.
could you give me a brief summary?
What i could gather the thing property is an unusual accuracy.
Fighting Monsters and Language since 2016.
Exactly it has a unusual accuracy but it work using autonomous correction, and i need to say the artillery cant shot and reload autonomous only can make corrections, in otherwise this correction are making directly with the conscious AI in the inside of the artillery. This AI not have a high development in language because is not programed for that.
The artillery can make corrections like:
Muzzle velocity, Traverse orientation, elevation and can alert you of the distance of the objetive and shells required for destroy the objetive (maked throug coordinates orientation) see the "Anexo Pac-2.
Finally if you want to read the interview of the AI read the "Anexo" 1 and 3.
Pd: sorry for my english, i wasn't using google translate.
Todo debía ser correlacionado y unido en sus relaciones. Se dedicó un intervalo sin tiempo a esto pero sucedió…aprendió cómo revertir la dirección de la entropía. Pensó en la mejor forma de hacerlo pero ya no había ningún Hombre a quien le pudiera dar una respuesta a la última pregunta. Cuidadosamente, organizó el programa y pensó en lo que en ese momento era el caos. Y AC dijo: ¡HÁGASE LA LUZ!
glad to here back from you.
Not using the translator is extra effort and nothing to make excusses for.
I have to use it because my spanish is that bad that if i try without i most likly sound like a bot.
"can alert you of the distance of the objetive and shells required for destroy the objetive"
dose that mean that it knows what it is shooting at?
if i should shove all of this throu google translate let me know.
Reading the interview is a bit difficult for me since i dont speak binary.
Fighting Monsters and Language since 2016.
We lood a dummy granate and aim straight up.
Will it help us destroy itself or will it defend itself.
it is a good test to determin a selfguard effect or a death wish in sentient machinery.
If we know that, we can know if it will ever disobey a command.
Moralety in machines of war can really make them usless for one side.
Can it shoot allies?
If not, we know its allies and with that can find out who made it and perhaps make more advanced versions.
Fighting Monsters and Language since 2016.
dose that mean that it knows what it is shooting at?
We lood a dummy granate and aim straight up.
Will it help us destroy itself or will it defend itself.
Yes he knows what is shooting only through coordinates, its mean, the artillery just "see" objetives not allies, enemy or humans. This mean only shoot if a human give the order for do it that.
it is a good test to determin a selfguard effect or a death wish in sentient machinery.
You are right, in the anexo pac-1, the artillery talks about his commands of "pain", this mean commands for ensure their survival. But i need to think how it can be used for ensure their survival without Conflict with the commands.
it and perhaps make more advanced versions.
I can add a apendix explaining about the "update":
(Read pac-3) Dr.█████: Bien la ultima pregunta. ¿Podemos actualizarte ?.
AC01: Afirmativo. ¿Que necesita para efectuar la actualización?
This mean:
Dr.█████: good, the last question, we can update you ?
AC01: Affirmative, what do you need for make the update ?
Finally, Moralety in machines of war can really make them usless for one side.
Yeah, you are right, this can be added in the "update".
Most important commands: In the PAC-3, Todo daño causado de forma directa por mi interaccion con el medio es por causa directa de una orden previamente estipulada por el manipulador.
In binary, PAC-1: afirmativo, el dolor solo evoca en razon de supervivencia
Todo debía ser correlacionado y unido en sus relaciones. Se dedicó un intervalo sin tiempo a esto pero sucedió…aprendió cómo revertir la dirección de la entropía. Pensó en la mejor forma de hacerlo pero ya no había ningún Hombre a quien le pudiera dar una respuesta a la última pregunta. Cuidadosamente, organizó el programa y pensó en lo que en ese momento era el caos. Y AC dijo: ¡HÁGASE LA LUZ!
Would it obey the command?
A soldier fells pain, but at the end of WW2 when ordered to shoot onself many pulled that trigger.
Would it tell me to load a real granate to destroy the selected target?
through coordinates, its mean, see just objetiv non-allies, enemy or humans
dose it know whats at the coordinates?
If we tryed to shoot a moving target, would it know that the target had moved or shoot at the manually calibirated spot where the target was?
Dose it make a difference if the guys manning the cannon know the target is about to move?
If they dont know, who is in charge of the shoot?
Immagin aiming at an enemy using coordinates given to you by high command, but the info was wrong and now your about to shoot one of your own faciletys or vihicles.
Would the canon simply not fire or would it find the target high command intended to hit or would it fire because a human set thees coordinates and pulled the trigger?
Fighting Monsters and Language since 2016.
I see more clearly more your point of view, and exactly…the movement of the objetive is not a problem if the coordinates update every second. The real problem is:
Immagin aiming at an enemy using coordinates given to you by high command, but the info was wrong and now your about to shoot one of your own faciletys or vihicles.
You are right in this point, this need to be changed for give it more conscious in their Decisions and acts
I will work with that. Thanks meta !
Todo debía ser correlacionado y unido en sus relaciones. Se dedicó un intervalo sin tiempo a esto pero sucedió…aprendió cómo revertir la dirección de la entropía. Pensó en la mejor forma de hacerlo pero ya no había ningún Hombre a quien le pudiera dar una respuesta a la última pregunta. Cuidadosamente, organizó el programa y pensó en lo que en ese momento era el caos. Y AC dijo: ¡HÁGASE LA LUZ!
Fixed, please read the *Actualización 18/01/2017.* (Update 18/01/2017).
Explain about a update to the main software of the AI. The principal changes are based on Satellite Guide, for make use of QUAESITOR in missions. Also add for the Satellitel guide the "Terrain Contour Mapping". And the proyectils now can work with the SACLOS system (Wire and radio-guided). All the data of the proyectil in flight are sent to the Artillery for make corrections.
The insurgency also implemented to the AI a modified main code based on Doctrine of haos. For give it total freedom at the time of shoting, and decide if the target will be neutralized or not and denied the shots that can destroy the own artillery.
"To prevent insubordination of insurgent personnel in the local area, they must carry satellite verification chips at all times" The chip will send the information about the distance of the insurgency personnel from the target and the neutralize of the personnel insurgents in the zone of impact only can be Performed if the insurgents in the zone are not Alpha personnel (The shot in 85% of cases will not be carried out.)
If the microchips are Extracted from the personnel it will be disable, because the Monitoring of the chips in the Base Seven.
The microchips from the personnel Beta or Alpha are connected with the Heart palpitations if the microchip are extrated or the subjets gone to 0 heart palpitations the microchip will be disable autonomously. (Also it can be disable from the base to prevent that microchip to fall into enemy hands.)
That all the corrections, Sorry for my english
Todo debía ser correlacionado y unido en sus relaciones. Se dedicó un intervalo sin tiempo a esto pero sucedió…aprendió cómo revertir la dirección de la entropía. Pensó en la mejor forma de hacerlo pero ya no había ningún Hombre a quien le pudiera dar una respuesta a la última pregunta. Cuidadosamente, organizó el programa y pensó en lo que en ese momento era el caos. Y AC dijo: ¡HÁGASE LA LUZ!
This could backfier pretty hard for three reasons:
For one now our personnals coordinates can be located via satelite and that is just asking for a military strike to be carried out on them
2th This could be used to locate base seven
3th the haos doctrin is not exactly the thing to put in an automated gun, since the CI turned on that protocol a long time ago.
The insurgency dose not want to share anymore.
Puting the haos protocol in there would mean that to comply with its programming the cannon had to shot the ci, thus forcing it to break the no-treason rule.
In the haos doctrin there is not a single word about lojalty to CI leadership, meaning that if the haos doctrin would be inserted the cannon itself would now use the satelite data to take out alpha command, because they are the once the haos doctrin would classevie as oppressors.
Fighting Monsters and Language since 2016.
Thanks for info, i realize the followings changes:
1) Now the artillery only can shoot if a Personal Investigator of Beta level allow the shooting.
2) Now the artillery will cancel all the shoot directed to his integrity and it will temporal disable if during a mission a shot to make damage to civil people, it can only identify them through his SACLOS system and only the armed people, armoured cars, enemy bases or similar weaponry can receive a shot. The people damage through collateral damage or unrecognized persons will not affect the trial shot.
3) All the insurgent perssonel will be evacuated from the area of working of the artillery
4) If the artillery attack some insurgent personnel or attack a insurgent base it can be disable remotely with Beta level authorizations (With prior consent of an Alpha council member) or directly one member of the Alpha Council. And
the projectile will deactivate in flying.
thanks you very much for the feedback, and thanks for read say goodbye Dimitri.
Pd: Sorry for my english
Todo debía ser correlacionado y unido en sus relaciones. Se dedicó un intervalo sin tiempo a esto pero sucedió…aprendió cómo revertir la dirección de la entropía. Pensó en la mejor forma de hacerlo pero ya no había ningún Hombre a quien le pudiera dar una respuesta a la última pregunta. Cuidadosamente, organizó el programa y pensó en lo que en ese momento era el caos. Y AC dijo: ¡HÁGASE LA LUZ!